What can she
“get away with”?
I’ve read
this from critics about a virtuoso classics scholar who takes myths and writes
new ones based on the structures of the old ones. What’s to get away with, when
we are building on structures with meaning? Garnering awards on the one hand
and being asked such questions on the other.
Artists of
all kinds are asked these questions – or the critics, the public, ask them.
What does it mean to “get away with”?
To me, the
getting-away-with, in its best light comes from pushing a line of accepted
tradition or story or image or belief a little beyond, or sometimes far beyond,
where it has settled, and still gaining respect for the integrity of the
internal form of creation, the life still humming. This is not crafting a
machine, elegant as it may be, but the nourishing of a thought-form, which
lives as it is designed and created and
which lives further through the interaction of sharing it – the reading, the
seeing, the verbalization, the expectation and breathless anticipation then the
birth, the ogling, the possibilities set free and the imaginations excited.
The art of
“getting away with” shows when respect is earned through the expression – the
individual power of the energy expression, the example of living and breathing
form.
Turn to me, she says, though her expression is
stoic. The playfulness is inherent, visible in the glow and the intimate
knowledge when seen. Watch.
Perhaps
Nelson Mandela did this too. His
mischievous nature and quick, bright, warm smile did not belie but was part of
the ramrod straight, steel-willed man who was constantly open to examining his
life and the purpose, the objectives for which he lived. He knew that the
purpose of life was so profound, the purpose of what we devote our lives, our
energies to, is so profound that to be willing to commit our energies totally
to it, to living this primary focus is to be willing to die for the same
purpose. Our commitment to life and
death is equal, as our honoring of change and growth and freedom is complete. The
commitment is not separate, but total. And without playfulness, and a sense of
humor about ourselves and life, joy is not complete.
Enlightenment
of our minds from our heart’s total intention to love and to contribute to the external
common and greater good is one of the greatest purposes we can have and live as
human beings.
Does how we
define freedom change with the times, with events in our lives? Isn’t this one
definition of learning?
As Mandela
said, yesterday I was a “terrorist.” Today I am accepted as a freedom fighter.
More todays and he is accepted as a leader, president, even symbol. Today we
have a history to view through many lenses and with many voices and visions. What
we choose defines us.
How do we choose/decide
except through the living?
Choice by
choice, and the strength that comes from that freedom, brings us the power that
is inherent in experience, the joy and sorrow bundled together with sparkles
and tears, endurance and infinite patience.
No comments:
Post a Comment